To compare the diagnostic agreement and performances of synthetic and conventional mammograms when artificial intelligence–based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) is applied.
From January 2017 to April 2017, 192 patients (mean age 53.7 ± 11.7 years) diagnosed with 203 breast cancers were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with digital mammograms (DM) simultaneously. Commercial AI-CAD was applied to the reconstructed synthetic mammograms (SM) from DBT and DM respectively and abnormality scores were calculated. We compared the median abnormality scores between DM and SM with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and used the Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate agreements between the two mammograms and to investigate clinicopathological factors which might affect agreement. Diagnostic performances were compared using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
The abnormality scores showed a mean difference (bias) of - 3.26 (95% limits of agreement: - 32.69, 26.18) between the two mammograms by the Bland-Altman analysis. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.934 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.946), suggesting high reproducibility. SM showed higher abnormality scores in cancer with distortion and occult findings, T1 and N0 cancer, and luminal type cancer than DM (all p ≤ 0.001). Diagnostic performance did not differ between the mammograms (AUC 0.945 for conventional mammograms, 0.938 for synthetic mammograms, p = 0.499).
AI-CAD can also work well on synthetic mammograms, showing good agreement and comparable diagnostic performance compared to its application to DM.
• AI-CAD which was developed based on imaging findings of digital mammograms can also be applied to synthetic mammograms.
• AI-CAD showed good agreement and similar diagnostic performance when applied to both synthetic and digital mammograms.
• With AI-CAD, synthetic mammograms showed relatively higher abnormality scores in cancer with distortion and occult findings, T1 and N0 cancer, and luminal type cancer than digital mammograms.
Si Eun Lee1 ; Kyunghwa Han2 ; Eun-Kyung Kim3
1Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, 2Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, 3Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital
Photometric Transformer Networks and Label Adjustment for Breast Density Prediction
External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms
A Robust and Effective Approach Towards Accurate Metastasis Detection and pN-stage Classification in Breast Cancer
A Unified Framework for Tumor Proliferation Score Prediction in Breast Histopathology
Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study
Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study
Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms
Applying Data-driven Imaging Biomarker in Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: Preliminary Study
Reducing Domain Gap by Reducing Style Bias
유방촬영의 위양성 판정에 관한 전통적 진단보조프로그램과 인공지능 기반 진단보조프로그램의 비교
인공지능 기반 컴퓨터 보조진단을 이용한 선별 유방촬영술에서의 간격암에 대한 후향 분석
Mammographic Surveillance After Breast Conserving Therapy: Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection
Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Microcalcification on Mammography
Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?